Nasdaq bounce shoves aside value comeback
What goes around….often just keeps going: ‘value’ bounce may be fading already
Indications so far from Wednesday’s U.S. stock trading session suggest that the move to favour cheaper, higher-yielding shares over long-standing 'momentum' outperformers, may be fizzling out already. Despite lacklustre sessions earlier this week, which saw the S&P 500 index close flat on Monday, Wall Street has been awash with talk over a sharp swing—known as a ‘rotation’—away from one set of equity market sector preferences in favour of another. The move back to ‘value’ shares from ‘momentum’ stocks was the fiercest over one trading day, according to data gathered by Bloomberg. The chart below shows daily percentage changes of the spread between Bloomberg’s ‘U.S Pure Value Index’ and ‘U.S. Pure Growth Index’.
‘Momentum’ is typified by techy consumer growth names like Amazon, Facebook and Netflix which continue to sit on triple percentage digit price returns over several years. Banks, insurance firms, makers of capital goods, telecoms and other industrial segments often populate the ‘value’ sphere. What appeared to be the beginnings of a value comeback boosted stocks in many industries that have struggled over the last few years. On Tuesday, this created a sea of green that included all but one S&P 500 bank (the exception was Wells Fargo) also boosting struggling retailer JCPenney above its consensus target price for the first time in several weeks, amid apparently no company specific news.
Absolute change chart: ‘U.S. Pure Value Index’ / ‘U.S. Pure Growth Index’ spread – Daily
Source: Bloomberg /City Index
By Wednesday, the same measures show ‘value’ slumping back sharply. That may not be much of a surprise given the outsize move in the opposite direction earlier in the week. Part of the swing is associated with this week’s resounding government bond market correction as the multi-month rally in developed market bonds and beyond shows signs of fraying. The idea that links a bond correction to a possible swing to value is that if the bond rally may soon peter out, investors might be switching back from chasing absolute bond price gains and returning to yield seeking in shares. With Treasury yields looking less sure-footed into the U.S. cash open though—yields were 1.4 basis points (bp) to 3.2bp lower across the curve—enthusiasm about a switch back to ‘value’ is lower too.
As for whether this week’s events may mark a lasting turn in investors’ prevailing preference, the jury’s out. If bonds (which move inversely to yields) continue rallying on the back of redoubled Fed easing hopes, value may continue to struggle. But what if recession fears bed down deeply enough to trigger a lasting move to the relative safety of ‘value’ stocks against preferences for shares related to other styles, like ‘momentum’, but also ‘volatility’ and others? In that case, eye-catching swings we’ve seen this week could pave the way for lasting changes among stock market leadership.
Chart thoughts
The technology-stock heavy (and thus ‘momentum’ / ‘growth’-sensitive) Nasdaq 100 index is the most relevant backdrop as the eternal battle between those styles comes to a head again. The US Tech 100 CFD proxy shows the market is in a long, slow coil as it hovers close to July’s latest record peak. Closing in, the market’s recovery from August’s mini-correction remains valid, particularly judged from coherence of another ‘coil’ or wedge, forming over several weeks. As it stands, its hypothetical effect is that it will keep funnelling prices higher so long as there are no sustained moves to the downside of the pattern. As prices ascend, the first significant impediments are a moderate distance away. 8018, was the high on the day after July’s record and the best the market could do on its only down day that week. The peak itself was 8035. Even if a ‘value’ takeover really has begun, a bullish-looking Nasdaq chart suggests the shift will be a gradual rather than sudden one, if at all. Even then, true confirmation would still need to wait for 1. A further Nasdaq 100 failure at this year’s top so far, and 2. A clean break of the nearest proven major support, 7308, followed by inarguable follow-through.
US Tech 100 CFD – Daily
Source: City Index
From time to time, StoneX Financial Pty Ltd (“we”, “our”) website may contain links to other sites and/or resources provided by third parties. These links and/or resources are provided for your information only and we have no control over the contents of those materials, and in no way endorse their content. Any analysis, opinion, commentary or research-based material on our website is for information and educational purposes only and is not, in any circumstances, intended to be an offer, recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell. You should always seek independent advice as to your suitability to speculate in any related markets and your ability to assume the associated risks, if you are at all unsure. No representation or warranty is made, express or implied, that the materials on our website are complete or accurate. We are not under any obligation to update any such material.
As such, we (and/or our associated companies) will not be responsible or liable for any loss or damage incurred by you or any third party arising out of, or in connection with, any use of the information on our website (other than with regards to any duty or liability that we are unable to limit or exclude by law or under the applicable regulatory system) and any such liability is hereby expressly disclaimed.
City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Pty Ltd.
The material provided herein is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs.
While every care has been taken in preparing this material, we do not provide any representation or warranty (express or implied) with respect to its completeness or accuracy. This is not an invitation or an offer to invest nor is it a recommendation to buy or sell investments.
StoneX recommends you to seek independent financial and legal advice before making any financial investment decision. Trading CFDs and FX on margin carries a higher level of risk, and may not be suitable for all investors. The possibility exists that you could lose more than your initial investment further CFD investors do not own or have any rights to the underlying assets.
It is important you consider our Financial Services Guide and Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) available at www.cityindex.com/en-au/terms-and-policies/, before deciding to acquire or hold our products. As a part of our market risk management, we may take the opposite side of your trade. Our Target Market Determination (TMD) is also available at www.cityindex.com/en-au/terms-and-policies/.
StoneX Financial Pty Ltd, Suite 28.01, 264 George Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 (ACN 141 774 727, AFSL 345646) is the CFD issuer and our products are traded off exchange.
© City Index 2024