All trading involves risk. Ensure you understand those risks before trading.
All trading involves risk. Ensure you understand those risks before trading.

Nasdaq 100 – Dow Ratio: Focus on Concentration Rather than Timing Risk Trends - Top Trade of 2025

/Article Content/Author Heading AMP/Article Authors/Header/Author Image AMP Wrapper/Author Image AMP(3,10) : error : Unexpected exception when calling sc_field i_item.AuthorImage.target Alt
Article By:

Talking Points:

- Timing is hard enough in navigating markets, but to assess market trends while prevailing fundamental winds are inconsistent makes probabilities even thinner

- While it can grow extreme, there tends to be a ‘balance’ in speculative preferences and exposure – similar to activity levels

- Over the past year, the concentration into top market cap stocks – which aligns to tech – has pushed the Nasdaq 100 to Dow ratio well above the Dot-com peak

 

Engaging markets is always a factor of navigating probabilities. There is no certainty in trading or investing – no matter how much we trust our process, the charts or even policymakers – so it is our job to evaluate the likelihood of developments; and determine whether a view has surpassed our personal risk tolerance as something to actively pursue.

There is nothing more fundamental in the bigger picture of fundamentals in my view than ‘risk trends’ as it can dictate the under currents of virtually every market and asset in the system. However, getting a clear gauge on sentiment seems challenging. There is an unmistakable persistence in speculative reach as benchmarks like the S&P 500 hit record highs, but the din of questioning its value and persistence are as loud as the headlines applauding the new bullish milestones.

Over different times this past year, it seems that a different engine was directing sentiment: softer inflation expectations, forecasts of central bank easing, improved growth forecasts, a change in political leadership, etc. Through these phases, correlations of indices and headlines tightened; but they would eventually fade – and often without much heads up. I think it is better to avoid trying to time the direction and tempo of broader risk trends (but do be aware if/when that transition occurs) and look instead to where there are exaggerated concentrations. That said, there is nowhere more intense than the ratio between Nasdaq 100 to the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

 

Chart of the Nasdaq 100 to Dow Jones Industrial Average Ratio (Daily)

Source: TradingView, John Kicklighter

Sentiment permeates all markets – whether on the micro level of the individual asset or macro as a reflecting of the broader financial system. My preferred representative of the whole market is equities given its ubiquity in the most portfolios (particularly in individual and representative fund accounts), which is further concentrated into the major US indices. Within this indicative ecosystem, the Nasdaq 100 has taken on the lead of the multi-year technology drive which was further intensified through this past year’s AI surge.

There is no telling how long the goldilocks of risk appetite between growth and monetary policy conditions can be maintained; but given the concentration in the top market cap names and tech tickers in particular, circumstances look particularly stretched. To focus more on the intensity of exposure rather than ‘risk trends’ themselves, I like to look at the Nasdaq 100 relative to another index with a different systemic makeup. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is a ‘blue chip’ oriented value index that is more balanced in terms of industry. And yet, the ratio of the Nasdaq to Dow has soared through the peak of the Dot-com boom back in March of 2000.

 

Chart of the Nasdaq 100 to Dow Ratio Overlaid with S&P 500 and 25-Week Correlation (Weekly)

Source: TradingView, John Kicklighter

It is hard to miss the disparity in performance between the two indices when we look at the historical chart of their ratio. The rise of AI – so well incapsulated by the more than 210 percent, peak-to-trough surge of NVDA through the year – can add another to factor to the relative shift of capital to this corner of the market. However, the transformative appeal of that segment may already be pushing its limits.

While a regulatory change that supercharges artificial intelligence in the US could prove an outlier amplifier, sentiment is more likely to take one of two paths. One scenario is risk either levels out or persists, whereby capital will more likely be diversified looking for ‘value’. Alternatively, a collapse in sentiment would likely render the concentration a distinct liability – as was the case in 2022.

 

Chart of the Nasdaq 100 to Dow Jones Industrial Average Ratio with VIX Volatility Index and 6-Month Correlation (Monthly)

Source: TradingView, John Kicklighter

In projecting how quickly and intensively the market is likely to rebalance across the risk spectrum, the catalyst and market backdrop play key factors. There was a bout of high volatility through August this last year, which was very acute but short-lived. Setting aside that brief period, the general volatility environment has been more akin to the period through 2017. Should activity conditions normalize under emerging fundamental issues, a correction like that seen this past August could turn into something more significant like what was experienced through 2022. Should the Nasdaq-Dow ratio drop beneath 0.35, something more systemic is likely to be afoot with sentiment undergoing a genuine sea change.

 

-- Written by John Kicklighter, Global Head of Content

From time to time, StoneX Financial Pty Ltd (“we”, “our”) website may contain links to other sites and/or resources provided by third parties. These links and/or resources are provided for your information only and we have no control over the contents of those materials, and in no way endorse their content. Any analysis, opinion, commentary or research-based material on our website is for information and educational purposes only and is not, in any circumstances, intended to be an offer, recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell. You should always seek independent advice as to your suitability to speculate in any related markets and your ability to assume the associated risks, if you are at all unsure. No representation or warranty is made, express or implied, that the materials on our website are complete or accurate. We are not under any obligation to update any such material.

As such, we (and/or our associated companies) will not be responsible or liable for any loss or damage incurred by you or any third party arising out of, or in connection with, any use of the information on our website (other than with regards to any duty or liability that we are unable to limit or exclude by law or under the applicable regulatory system) and any such liability is hereby expressly disclaimed.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Pty Ltd.

The material provided herein is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs.

While every care has been taken in preparing this material, we do not provide any representation or warranty (express or implied) with respect to its completeness or accuracy. This is not an invitation or an offer to invest nor is it a recommendation to buy or sell investments.

StoneX recommends you to seek independent financial and legal advice before making any financial investment decision. Trading CFDs and FX on margin carries a higher level of risk, and may not be suitable for all investors. The possibility exists that you could lose more than your initial investment further CFD investors do not own or have any rights to the underlying assets.

It is important you consider our Financial Services Guide and Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) available at www.cityindex.com/en-au/terms-and-policies/, before deciding to acquire or hold our products. As a part of our market risk management, we may take the opposite side of your trade. Our Target Market Determination (TMD) is also available at www.cityindex.com/en-au/terms-and-policies/.

StoneX Financial Pty Ltd, Suite 28.01, 264 George Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 (ACN 141 774 727, AFSL 345646) is the CFD issuer and our products are traded off exchange.

© City Index 2025