All trading involves risk. Ensure you understand those risks before trading.
All trading involves risk. Ensure you understand those risks before trading.

Gold Forecast: XAU/USD Stalls Inside of $2900, $3k Looms Large

Article By: ,  Sr. Strategist

 

 

Gold Talking Points:

  • Much of last year saw gold prices in a blistering rally, rising by as much as 40% from the February lows to the October highs.
  • The advance finally met its match at the 2800 handle, as bulls stalled before a test of the level in October and failed to get above that price until late-January.
  • The breakout at 2800 has so far been fast and aggressive, but something similar is now happening at $2900/oz, as buyers have stalled, and prices are pulling back. And naturally, the $3k level presents something of a quandary overhead, explained further below.

It’s been a strong past year for gold and if we draw back to mid-February of last year, that was the last test of the $2k handle that we’ve seen in the precious metal. At the time there was legitimate concern that the Fed might not be able to cut rates in 2024, and an above-expected CPI print on February 13th triggered that concern.

On the back of that inflation print spot gold prices sank below the $2k level for the first time in 2024, but the move would prove to be short lived as the following day, on the 14th, a doji appeared on the heels of a dovish comment from Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee, who seemingly shrugged off the inflation print which markets read to mean that the Fed still may cut later that year.

The day after gold broke out above the $2,000/oz level and never looked back. There hasn’t been another instance of gold trading below that level ever since, and now, gold prices are nearing the next major psychological level of $3,000/oz.

 

Gold Daily Price Chart

Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview

 

Gold Big Figures

 

It can be difficult to imagine anything other than a trend when that trend has been so strongly in-force for any length of time. Such was the case back in the summer of 2020, when gold prices were rallying aggressively on the back of the Fed’s response to the Covid pandemic.

That’s what brought the first ever test of $2,000/oz, and it happened so quickly that it seemed most were afraid to sell. The break of $2k was a violent affair, as there was virtually no resistance on the daily chart when the breakout initially took place. Bulls even tried to run with the trend, eventually getting as high as $2,075 on Friday of that same week; but that’s also when they started to fail.

A sizable pullback developed on that Friday but it was the next Tuesday, one week to the day of the $2k break that gold really started to sell-off. And just a day later that pullback had taken on an entirely new form, with gold prices setting a low of $1863/oz.

From the monthly chart the patterning is a bit clearer, as this was essentially just a false breakout at the $2k level. But – for the next three-and-a-half years, that resistance remained as the spot that bulls just could not leave behind – even with the monetary mayhem developing around global central banks.

Bitcoin is often pointed to as a factor and to be sure, it likely played a role as an alternative for anti-fiat flows. At the first test of $2k in spot gold in August of 2020, Bitcoin was still struggling to get back above $12k. A mere eight months later Bitcoin was trading at $69k so, logically, some of the capital flow that traditionally would’ve went to gold was directed towards cryptocurrencies.

But – this doesn’t explain the three, almost four-year struggle that bulls had at the $2k level in Gold.

 

Gold Monthly Price Chart

Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview

 

Gold Shorter-Term: Accumulation v/s Distribution

 

Last year, especially in the second-half when the bullish trend in gold was already priced-in for a few months, there was a tendency for gold prices to stall or slow around each test of a new major psychological level.

As a case in point, it was the start of the FOMC rate cut cycle in September that finally brought that first test of $2600 – but that didn’t last for long, as the press conference after the announcement saw a stern $50-plus drop. This appeared to have been profit taking but bulls were still aggressive, which is why higher-low support showed up and buyers simply pressed ahead.

From that rally we saw a stalling effect ahead of a test of $2700, which led to another sizable pullback before buyers showed support above $2600, and then the same happened at $2800 as buyers pulled up just about $10 shy of the level to set a high in late-October.

That’s finally where the gold bullish trend in 2024 met its match, and the next two months saw digestion of the prior trend as prices built in a symmetrical triangle formation that held into the end of the year. There was also the Bitcoin effect at-play, as the post-election backdrop brought a massive rally in cryptocurrencies and along the way gold prices were on their back foot.

This was a fairly clear-cut case of distribution following a year of mostly accumulation – but it also didn’t indicate that a larger reversal was afoot as buyers showed higher-lows in December.

 

Gold Daily Price Chart

Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview

 

Gold Shorter-Term Strategy

 

Something happened after the December FOMC meeting.

On the day of that announcement, when the Fed suddenly sounded less-dovish than they had in a long time, gold prices had sold off to test below that same $2600 level that was resistance at the September rate cut. But the day after that same support held, and bulls slowly started to come back into the picture.

It was mid-January when gold finally broke out of the symmetrical triangle formation which, when meshed against the prior bullish trend, made for a bull pennant formation.

And that trend in gold has been rather smooth ever since, all the way until this week’s push of a fresh all-time-high, just inside of the $2,900 level.

While I do think there’s impact from buyers showing trepidation of testing a new, major psychological level – I think there’s also impact of the price that hasn’t yet come into the picture and that’s the $3k handle. Because from both bullish and bearish perspectives, a level of that nature could be at trend-changer, at least for the short-term.

If already long, then getting closer to $3k could be incentivization to take profit. If not already long, it could be a hindrance to adding exposure. And, if bearish, getting closer to that level could start to justify counter-trend stances, opening the door for reversal plays given that there’s a theoretical line-in-the-sand at which stop loss orders could be placed.

And, after all, a level like $3k doesn’t have to come into play before it starts to tilt the flow, as we can see from the drama around the $2k level. Sure, it was resistance for almost four years, even as the Fed was in their most dovish stance in history – but it also loomed large back in 2011, when spot gold prices topped at $1,920 before ultimately reversing. That high held for the next nine years, all the way until Covid and the next exuberant Fed response.

So there could be the making of a major top at-play. Short-term price action doesn’t suggest as such yet, as we just made a fresh all-time-high yesterday and the move that we’re seeing now is likely at least somewhat related to profit taking following a smooth bullish trend.

But – as noted a little higher, nearing a $3k test for the first time in history is where price flow dynamics in gold can begin to shift, and traders on both sides of the move need to be aware of that potential.

For now – support potential remains at $2825-$2830, after which $2800-$2804 comes into the picture. If bears can drive a weekly close below that $2800 price, then a larger reversal thesis could begin to take on more attraction.

 

Gold Four-Hour Chart

Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview

 

--- written by James Stanley, Senior Strategist

 

 

From time to time, StoneX Financial Pty Ltd (“we”, “our”) website may contain links to other sites and/or resources provided by third parties. These links and/or resources are provided for your information only and we have no control over the contents of those materials, and in no way endorse their content. Any analysis, opinion, commentary or research-based material on our website is for information and educational purposes only and is not, in any circumstances, intended to be an offer, recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell. You should always seek independent advice as to your suitability to speculate in any related markets and your ability to assume the associated risks, if you are at all unsure. No representation or warranty is made, express or implied, that the materials on our website are complete or accurate. We are not under any obligation to update any such material.

As such, we (and/or our associated companies) will not be responsible or liable for any loss or damage incurred by you or any third party arising out of, or in connection with, any use of the information on our website (other than with regards to any duty or liability that we are unable to limit or exclude by law or under the applicable regulatory system) and any such liability is hereby expressly disclaimed.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Pty Ltd.

The material provided herein is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs.

While every care has been taken in preparing this material, we do not provide any representation or warranty (express or implied) with respect to its completeness or accuracy. This is not an invitation or an offer to invest nor is it a recommendation to buy or sell investments.

StoneX recommends you to seek independent financial and legal advice before making any financial investment decision. Trading CFDs and FX on margin carries a higher level of risk, and may not be suitable for all investors. The possibility exists that you could lose more than your initial investment further CFD investors do not own or have any rights to the underlying assets.

It is important you consider our Financial Services Guide and Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) available at www.cityindex.com/en-au/terms-and-policies/, before deciding to acquire or hold our products. As a part of our market risk management, we may take the opposite side of your trade. Our Target Market Determination (TMD) is also available at www.cityindex.com/en-au/terms-and-policies/.

StoneX Financial Pty Ltd, Suite 28.01, 264 George Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 (ACN 141 774 727, AFSL 345646) is the CFD issuer and our products are traded off exchange.

© City Index 2025