Market pins hopes on Shadow Backstop
Sterling faces a fresh rout or a big rescue depending on how Johnson’s ‘new’ customs plan pans out
Talk of ‘green lights’, ‘tunnels’, and ‘constructive’ discussions has given UK-tied assets a shot in the arm. Now for the hard part.
From the markets’ point of view, the next challenge is to see the skin on the bones of the sketchy outline that’s emerged so far, on which so much optimism has been based. The pound’s upwards surge on Friday is now the biggest since 2009. This follows the “pathway” to a deal that emerged after what were widely seen as last-ditch talks between PMs Johnson and Varadkar on Thursday.
Indications from a specialised type of options trade called a risk reversal underscore the momentum of the swing in sentiment. According to Bloomberg data that, admittedly, only go back to 2003, gauges of this ‘risk-neutral’ strategy are showing the biggest bullish bias ever.
GBP/USD 1-month risk-reversal – Daily [11/10/2019 14:53:05]
Source: Bloomberg/City Index
This type of strategy is mostly the domain of professional traders, including those employed by major financial institutions. Combined with what could be a record low in sterling risk-reversals in days leading up to the Brexit referendum, Friday’s moves suggest that the biggest and bearish market participants are showing signs of throwing in the towel. Also, some of the biggest enthusiasm ever for buying the pound seen since 2016. The current move has been building up for weeks but is hitting a peak on Friday. That’s in line with increasingly hopeful news flow. The other way of looking at today’s trades is as a humongous short squeeze. That could certainly help account for the size and intensity of some of the cross-asset surges on view.
But are these moves justified, given what we know for sure, which in reality is not much?
London and Brussels have now signalled that they’re approaching the possibility of detailed talks. The EU’s chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, whom no one believes is given to capricious decisions, has let it be known that he recommended that EU-UK talks should enter a procedure known as a ‘tunnel’.
Talks will thus intensify from here—continuing over the weekend—and Brussels is expected to ‘take stock’ on Monday.
This renewed enthusiasm for talks can really only mean that there’s something new to talk about; a new concession, and it must have come from Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Reports point to something linked to customs, what else? Whatever that something is obviously hasn’t been disclosed. Yet only a kind of ‘shadow backstop’ that can be defined by the UK as ‘not quite the backstop’ will really cut the mustard. Briefings by Downing Street today have suggested Britain may now be open to a simple majority endorsement of any deal by Northern Ireland, instead of the Irish veto Johnson initially proposed. That would also be cogent with a ‘backstop prequel’, along the lines of its initial form from February 2018. The EU noted on Friday that its position on the backstop hasn’t changed. Still, it’s worth noting that a ‘time-limited’ backstop has been rallying quite sharply this week, on both sides.
If Johnson’s new proposal turns out to be along the speculated lines, these may turn out to be fault lines.
At this stage, it remains touch and go whether Brexit-supporting Conservatives will support such a plan, having consistently rejected any notion of an Irish border. The former rebels have buttressed the PM from the worst effects of his loss of control over Parliament but may now become less reliable. How the rest of the House will take such plans is just as uncertain, as is the response from the small Northern Ireland unionist party that has played an outsize role in underpinning the Tories.
If any of these of threads unravels, the deal can unravel too, taking an almost unprecedented swing by sterling with it.
Any resumed downturn wouldn’t stop there either. The largest British shares that have the closest known ties to the UK have been rallying sharply, some in double digit percentage amounts, this session. RBS, Kingfisher, Barratt, Lloyds, Persimmon, Next, BT, ITV and several others – some EU-listed – are likely to return the day’s gains rapidly, at the first whiff of disappointment. In the worst case, the EU suggests that a let-down might cause it to abandon ‘tunnel’ talks. Even if nothing as drastic as that is seen, moderation of the tone of EU-UK commentary relative to the optimistic levels of recent days could chill sentiment too. Under current circumstance, signs that Brussels and London are moving to a short highly conditional extension could still be taken positively by investors.
Chart thoughts
Cable will need to do something very simple to demonstrate that buyers are crossing the line from ‘hopeful’ to ‘(more) convinced. At the time, the high on 25th June around $1.2784 looked like an innocuous attempt to extend a near two-week up move. The outcome was a not very surprising failure, but for various reasons the scale was large. The pound eventually bottomed at one of its deepest lows in two years. Hence a well-founded bull ought to be able to push aside $1.2784 fairly easily. Particularly in the context of the year’s $1.33 highs, when a ‘no-deal’ disaster was averted but with no end to Brexit in sight at the time. GBP/USD slicing through the trend line connecting highs back to the March peak was a good sign. The rate must now follow through in a few sessions or an inclination to fade will set in.
GBP/USD - Daily
Source: City Index
StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.
No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.
For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.
City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.
City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.
The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.
© City Index 2024