How Could the US Presidential Election Impact Markets? A 40-Year Study Looking at 5 Key Markets
Love it or hate it, the 2024 US Presidential Election will only continue to get more media coverage from here. In an effort to head off the inevitable efforts to tie election results to market performance, we’ve analyzed the last 10 US Presidential elections, 40 years’ worth of data, and the price action of five key markets: EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/JPY, the S&P 500, and Gold.
Of course, every election brings its own unique circumstances and stakes, so the data and figures in this guide should not be taken as gospel for what will happen in the 2024 election. As you may have heard before, past market performance is not necessarily indicative of future outcomes.
Likewise, your approach to trading around elections may be different than another trader who reads this article. For example, you may see politics as a potential edge to exploit in your trading whereas another trader may sit them out entirely, opting to remain to the sidelines until the future outlook is less cloudy.
Regardless of your preferred approach, a thorough, historically-informed perspective of the potential impact of US elections on markets will help you better prepare for and plan around situations when the political stakes are high.
EUR/USD, GBP/USD, and USD/JPY Analysis: How Have US Presidential Elections Impacted the Forex Market?
At a high level, the US dollar has not shown a consistent trend of strengthening or weakening in one month before, one week after, one month after, or one quarter after US Presidential Election days over the last 10 elections.
As the chart below shows, the greenback has strengthened in the run-up to the election against the euro in each of the last four elections, but it had fallen (EUR/USD up) in four of the previous six. Likewise, EUR/USD had shown a tendency to fall in the quarter after a US Presidential election in the 1980s and ‘90s, but that “trend” has grown more neutral in recent decades:
Source: TradingView, StoneX. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Source: TradingView, StoneX. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
GBP/USD showed a similar trend of US dollar strength (GBP/USD lower) in the quarter after an election in the 1980s and ‘90s, but that greenback has seen its post-election performance normalize since 2000:
Source: TradingView, StoneX. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Source: TradingView, StoneX. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
As for USD/JPY, the clearest “trend” around elections has been persistent strength in the quarter after US Presidential elections. However, it is worth noting that USD/JPY has generally appreciated over the last four decades, so it’s difficult to parse whether such moves are related to the election or the broader macroeconomic trends of the last four decades.
Source: TradingView, StoneX. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Source: TradingView, StoneX. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Gold Analysis: How Have US Presidential Elections Impacted the Gold Market?
Turning our attention to gold, we can see that the yellow metal has generally weakened both before and after US Presidential elections, albeit with notable exceptions. To my eye, the most interesting tidbit from the table below is that, barring the onset of the Great Financial Crisis in 2008, Gold has fallen in the 3 months after a US Presidential Election eight out of nine times, with the only positive return coming in at a paltry +0.2% gain in 2004/2005:
Source: TradingView, StoneX. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Source: TradingView, StoneX. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
S&P 500 Analysis: How Have US Presidential Elections Impacted the US Stock Market?
Last but not least, US indices are the market that would most logically see a stronger reaction to US Presidential elections. In each of the last five Presidential Elections, the S&P 500 has fallen in the month leading up to the election. Additionally, the S&P 500 has gained ground in quarter following an election eight of the last ten times (though of course, the US stock market has generally strengthened over longer time periods):
Source: TradingView, StoneX. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Source: TradingView, StoneX. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Ultimately, the politicians and parties occupying the White House and Congress are just one of the many variables that drive the stock market, the US dollar, and gold. Though the historical returns highlighted above cover four decades of price action, it’s important to remember that absolute number of presidencies included (10) is still relatively small and markets are constantly evolving.
For some readers, the uncertainty leading up to a close election can provide compelling trading opportunities, but the direct impact of elections on markets is often exaggerated, especially by those with strong political views.
At the end of the day, the most important takeaway is to focus on developing a sustainable trading strategy that works regardless of which way the political winds are blowing at the moment.
-- Written by Matt Weller, Global Head of Research
Check out Matt’s Daily Market Update videos on YouTube and be sure to follow Matt on Twitter: @MWellerFX
StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.
No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.
For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.
City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.
City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.
The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.
© City Index 2024