CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Gold Price Forecast: Reversal or Pullback?

Article By: ,  Sr. Strategist

Gold Talking Points:

  • It’s been a banner year for gold with the metal rising as much as 40.61% from its 2024 lows, but that trend has been overbought on the monthly chart since April, and on the weekly chart since early-September.
  • The election night brought a strong sell-off in gold and at this point the question remains as to whether that’s the start of a reversal or whether it was a simple pullback in a broader bullish trend. So far, there’s been a strong reaction to 2650 support but it’s how the metal performs at tests of possible resistance that can provide early clues to bigger-picture direction.

Gold prices staged a massive sell-off on the night of the election, even as many other markets showed strength. The run in the US Dollar was notable and we’ve already seen that move soften a bit. As I highlighted in the video and article yesterday, with all of US rates, US equities and the US Dollar moving higher in tandem it really felt as though it was more a show of volatility than a sign of what’s to come. It remains unlikely that all three markets continue to go up for an extended period of time, and in my estimation, it’s the US Dollar that’s probably the most vulnerable to reversion. Since then, the USD has pulled back more and this has helped USD-denominated assets, such as EUR/USD and Gold, bounce a bit. But there may be more going on here and I wanted to focus-in on gold in this article.

In the pre-Election webinar I looked at a couple of waypoints in prediction markets to deduce relevant relationships in markets. And it was around October 9th and 10th when Trump’s odds started to pull away from Harris. Those odds had peaked before the election on the 29th of the month at 65% and then they narrowed for the next week.

As I showed in both the US Dollar and Bitcoin, it seemed a clear relationship existed, where Trump’s rising odds of victory came along with a stronger Dollar and higher prices in Bitcoin. But – a similar relationship held in gold, as gold prices bottomed on the morning of October 10th right around the release of CPI last month, and the current high formed on the 30th, just after Trump’s odds had peaked before the election.

 

Gold Daily Price Chart

Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview

 

Gold: The Fundamental Case

 

On its face it doesn’t seem as though there’s enough difference between expectations around Trump and Harris to completely change the outlook on gold. Both sides are likely to push growth-centered policies and neither side seems interested in reducing US debt and balancing the budget. As noted in the video yesterday, there could be a difference in Fed policy especially considering that Republicans have gained a likely supermajority. But, that’s unlikely to bring on a prioritization of limiting US debt as the behest of growth.

What could be of more interest, however, is competition as an anti-fiat vehicle from Bitcoin, and that’s something worth watching as the cryptocurrency has continued to push to fresh all-time-highs in the aftermath of the election.

But I think what we saw on election night and something that’s worth watching for the next few weeks and into the end of the year was the rally in the US Dollar, which resembles something similar from Trump’s first victory in 2016.

In that episode, the USD staged a stark turn-around as election results came in and this led to a massive move of USD-strength that ran for the next month. But this was accompanied by an increasingly-hawkish FOMC, as Janet Yellen had said that an incoming Republican supermajority at the time was likely to lean on fiscal stimulus, and monetary policy would need to buffer that. Lo and behold, the Fed hiked for only the second time since the Financial Collapse at their rate decision in December and they went on to hike three more times in 2017 and four more times in 2018. So, that attempt to buffer seemed to be on full display.

More interesting, however, is the US Dollar. While it initially gained on the back of Trump’s win in 2016, hitting a fresh high in December, it then went into a sell-off for the next year-and-change, even as the Fed was hiking rates. This similarly had impact on gold.

On the night of the election, as the US Dollar posed a brisk bullish reversal, the mirror image showed in gold. And then as the Dollar gained into December, eventually topping in the middle of the month, gold sold off until bottoming around the same time that the Dollar topped.

And then in 2017 as the USD tanked, gold prices rose briskly.

Gold Weekly Price Chart

Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview

 

Gold and USD

 

Spot gold is priced in US Dollars as can be seen in the quote of XAU/USD. So logically an inverse relationship can exist simply due to the mathematics of the situation. But – that’s not the only factor at-play in gold which is why a perfectly inverse correlation does not exist. Sometimes that will show, such as what we saw back in Q4 of 2016. But, others, such as we’ve seen this year, that relationship can wax and wane.

On the part of the US Dollar, I expect the two-year range to continue and the response we’ve seen over the past 24 hours to resistance speaks to that. Accordingly, that’s helped gold to bounce. But the bigger question, in my opinion, is whether we see some element of prudence from the FOMC regarding rate policy.

As the Fed continued to push more and more dovish through 2024, even as US economic data remained strong, gold prices continued to trend higher with bulls defending and protecting support with a degree of aggression. A great example is that swing-low last month on the morning of US CPI, when the data came out above expectation which would normally be construed as a negative factor for gold prices. But price action was anything but negative and from that deduction we can glean the fact that markets aren’t expecting the Fed to walk away from their desire and pledge to cut rates this year.

Later today another rate cut is expected from the FOMC. This is not a quarterly meeting, so there’s no updated projections or guidance to work from. It’s Powell’s hints at the presser that will likely be the driver.

But I think the real message will be in price action:  Whether we see longs that have been building positions this year paring exposure on tests of resistance at prior support. So far, at this early stage we’ve seen an aggressive bounce from 2650 and buyers have shredded through 2685. The next big level on the horizon is 2700 and if this is a stumbling block for buyers it can start to build an argument for lower-highs. Above that, 2714 remains key as this was a support level that was tested a couple of different times. Above that, 2724.51 which held a bounce into a lower-high earlier in the week, with sellers aggressive defending 2750.

To work with shorter-term bullish biases, traders can essentially look to those resistance points as higher-low supports following bullish confirmation from breakouts. So if 2700 trades, 2685 becomes a possible point of higher-low support. If 2714 trades, both 2700 and 2685 are in the equation.

For me to consider this a resumption of the bullish trend on a big picture basis, I want to see buyers drive trends above the 2750 level that held lower-highs on Tuesday as election results had started to flow in.

 

Gold Four-Hour Price Chart

Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview

 

 

--- written by James Stanley, Senior Strategist

 

Gold Talking Points:

  • It’s been a banner year for gold with the metal rising as much as 40.61% from its 2024 lows, but that trend has been overbought on the monthly chart since April, and on the weekly chart since early-September.
  • The election night brought a strong sell-off in gold and at this point the question remains as to whether that’s the start of a reversal or whether it was a simple pullback in a broader bullish trend. So far, there’s been a strong reaction to 2650 support but it’s how the metal performs at tests of possible resistance that can provide early clues to bigger-picture direction.
  • I look at gold in-depth from a number of time frames each week in the webinar, and it’s free to attend. Click here for registration information.

 

Gold AD

 

Gold prices staged a massive sell-off on the night of the election, even as many other markets showed strength. The run in the US Dollar was notable and we’ve already seen that move soften a bit. As I highlighted in the video and article yesterday, with all of US rates, US equities and the US Dollar moving higher in tandem it really felt as though it was more a show of volatility than a sign of what’s to come. It remains unlikely that all three markets continue to go up for an extended period of time, and in my estimation, it’s the US Dollar that’s probably the most vulnerable to reversion. Since then, the USD has pulled back more and this has helped USD-denominated assets, such as EUR/USD and Gold, bounce a bit. But there may be more going on here and I wanted to focus-in on gold in this article.

In the pre-Election webinar I looked at a couple of waypoints in prediction markets to deduce relevant relationships in markets. And it was around October 9th and 10th when Trump’s odds started to pull away from Harris. Those odds had peaked before the election on the 29th of the month at 65% and then they narrowed for the next week.

As I showed in both the US Dollar and Bitcoin, it seemed a clear relationship existed, where Trump’s rising odds of victory came along with a stronger Dollar and higher prices in Bitcoin. But – a similar relationship held in gold, as gold prices bottomed on the morning of October 10th right around the release of CPI last month, and the current high formed on the 30th, just after Trump’s odds had peaked before the election.

 

Gold Daily Price Chart

Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview

 

Gold: The Fundamental Case

 

On its face it doesn’t seem as though there’s enough difference between expectations around Trump and Harris to completely change the outlook on gold. Both sides are likely to push growth-centered policies and neither side seems interested in reducing US debt and balancing the budget. As noted in the video yesterday, there could be a difference in Fed policy especially considering that Republicans have gained a likely supermajority. But, that’s unlikely to bring on a prioritization of limiting US debt as the behest of growth.

What could be of more interest, however, is competition as an anti-fiat vehicle from Bitcoin, and that’s something worth watching as the cryptocurrency has continued to push to fresh all-time-highs in the aftermath of the election.

But I think what we saw on election night and something that’s worth watching for the next few weeks and into the end of the year was the rally in the US Dollar, which resembles something similar from Trump’s first victory in 2016.

In that episode, the USD staged a stark turn-around as election results came in and this led to a massive move of USD-strength that ran for the next month. But this was accompanied by an increasingly-hawkish FOMC, as Janet Yellen had said that an incoming Republican supermajority at the time was likely to lean on fiscal stimulus, and monetary policy would need to buffer that. Lo and behold, the Fed hiked for only the second time since the Financial Collapse at their rate decision in December and they went on to hike three more times in 2017 and four more times in 2018. So, that attempt to buffer seemed to be on full display.

More interesting, however, is the US Dollar. While it initially gained on the back of Trump’s win in 2016, hitting a fresh high in December, it then went into a sell-off for the next year-and-change, even as the Fed was hiking rates. This similarly had impact on gold.

On the night of the election, as the US Dollar posed a brisk bullish reversal, the mirror image showed in gold. And then as the Dollar gained into December, eventually topping in the middle of the month, gold sold off until bottoming around the same time that the Dollar topped.

And then in 2017 as the USD tanked, gold prices rose briskly.

 

Central Banks AD

 

Gold Weekly Price Chart

Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview

 

Gold and USD

 

Spot gold is priced in US Dollars as can be seen in the quote of XAU/USD. So logically an inverse relationship can exist simply due to the mathematics of the situation. But – that’s not the only factor at-play in gold which is why a perfectly inverse correlation does not exist. Sometimes that will show, such as what we saw back in Q4 of 2016. But, others, such as we’ve seen this year, that relationship can wax and wane.

On the part of the US Dollar, I expect the two-year range to continue and the response we’ve seen over the past 24 hours to resistance speaks to that. Accordingly, that’s helped gold to bounce. But the bigger question, in my opinion, is whether we see some element of prudence from the FOMC regarding rate policy.

As the Fed continued to push more and more dovish through 2024, even as US economic data remained strong, gold prices continued to trend higher with bulls defending and protecting support with a degree of aggression. A great example is that swing-low last month on the morning of US CPI, when the data came out above expectation which would normally be construed as a negative factor for gold prices. But price action was anything but negative and from that deduction we can glean the fact that markets aren’t expecting the Fed to walk away from their desire and pledge to cut rates this year.

Later today another rate cut is expected from the FOMC. This is not a quarterly meeting, so there’s no updated projections or guidance to work from. It’s Powell’s hints at the presser that will likely be the driver.

But I think the real message will be in price action:  Whether we see longs that have been building positions this year paring exposure on tests of resistance at prior support. So far, at this early stage we’ve seen an aggressive bounce from 2650 and buyers have shredded through 2685. The next big level on the horizon is 2700 and if this is a stumbling block for buyers it can start to build an argument for lower-highs. Above that, 2714 remains key as this was a support level that was tested a couple of different times. Above that, 2724.51 which held a bounce into a lower-high earlier in the week, with sellers aggressive defending 2750.

To work with shorter-term bullish biases, traders can essentially look to those resistance points as higher-low supports following bullish confirmation from breakouts. So if 2700 trades, 2685 becomes a possible point of higher-low support. If 2714 trades, both 2700 and 2685 are in the equation.

For me to consider this a resumption of the bullish trend on a big picture basis, I want to see buyers drive trends above the 2750 level that held lower-highs on Tuesday as election results had started to flow in.

 

Gold Four-Hour Price Chart

Chart prepared by James Stanley; data derived from Tradingview

 

 

--- written by James Stanley, Senior Strategist

StoneX Financial Ltd (trading as “City Index”) is an execution-only service provider. This material, whether or not it states any opinions, is for general information purposes only and it does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. This material has been prepared using the thoughts and opinions of the author and these may change. However, City Index does not plan to provide further updates to any material once published and it is not under any obligation to keep this material up to date. This material is short term in nature and may only relate to facts and circumstances existing at a specific time or day. Nothing in this material is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment, legal, tax or other advice and no reliance should be placed on it.

No opinion given in this material constitutes a recommendation by City Index or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although City Index is not specifically prevented from dealing before providing this material, City Index does not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination. This material is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person in any country or jurisdiction where such distribution or use would be contrary to local law or regulation.

For further details see our full non-independent research disclaimer and quarterly summary.

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 69% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. CFD and Forex Trading are leveraged products and your capital is at risk. They may not be suitable for everyone. Please ensure you fully understand the risks involved by reading our full risk warning.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Ltd. Head and Registered Office: 1st Floor, Moor House, 120 London Wall, London, EC2Y 5ET. StoneX Financial Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales, number: 05616586. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. FCA Register Number: 446717.

City Index is a trademark of StoneX Financial Ltd.

The information on this website is not targeted at the general public of any particular country. It is not intended for distribution to residents in any country where such distribution or use would contravene any local law or regulatory requirement.

© City Index 2024