Nasdaq 100 – Dow Ratio: Focus on Concentration Rather than Timing Risk Trends - Top Trade of 2025

/Article Content/Author Heading AMP/Article Authors/Header/Author Image AMP Wrapper/Author Image AMP(3,10) : error : Unexpected exception when calling sc_field i_item.AuthorImage.target Alt
Article By:

Talking Points:

- Timing is hard enough in navigating markets, but to assess market trends while prevailing fundamental winds are inconsistent makes probabilities even thinner

- While it can grow extreme, there tends to be a ‘balance’ in speculative preferences and exposure – similar to activity levels

- Over the past year, the concentration into top market cap stocks – which aligns to tech – has pushed the Nasdaq 100 to Dow ratio well above the Dot-com peak

 

Engaging markets is always a factor of navigating probabilities. There is no certainty in trading or investing – no matter how much we trust our process, the charts or even policymakers – so it is our job to evaluate the likelihood of developments; and determine whether a view has surpassed our personal risk tolerance as something to actively pursue.

There is nothing more fundamental in the bigger picture of fundamentals in my view than ‘risk trends’ as it can dictate the under currents of virtually every market and asset in the system. However, getting a clear gauge on sentiment seems challenging. There is an unmistakable persistence in speculative reach as benchmarks like the S&P 500 hit record highs, but the din of questioning its value and persistence are as loud as the headlines applauding the new bullish milestones.

Over different times this past year, it seems that a different engine was directing sentiment: softer inflation expectations, forecasts of central bank easing, improved growth forecasts, a change in political leadership, etc. Through these phases, correlations of indices and headlines tightened; but they would eventually fade – and often without much heads up. I think it is better to avoid trying to time the direction and tempo of broader risk trends (but do be aware if/when that transition occurs) and look instead to where there are exaggerated concentrations. That said, there is nowhere more intense than the ratio between Nasdaq 100 to the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

 

Chart of the Nasdaq 100 to Dow Jones Industrial Average Ratio (Daily)

Source: TradingView, John Kicklighter

Sentiment permeates all markets – whether on the micro level of the individual asset or macro as a reflecting of the broader financial system. My preferred representative of the whole market is equities given its ubiquity in the most portfolios (particularly in individual and representative fund accounts), which is further concentrated into the major US indices. Within this indicative ecosystem, the Nasdaq 100 has taken on the lead of the multi-year technology drive which was further intensified through this past year’s AI surge.

There is no telling how long the goldilocks of risk appetite between growth and monetary policy conditions can be maintained; but given the concentration in the top market cap names and tech tickers in particular, circumstances look particularly stretched. To focus more on the intensity of exposure rather than ‘risk trends’ themselves, I like to look at the Nasdaq 100 relative to another index with a different systemic makeup. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is a ‘blue chip’ oriented value index that is more balanced in terms of industry. And yet, the ratio of the Nasdaq to Dow has soared through the peak of the Dot-com boom back in March of 2000.

 

Chart of the Nasdaq 100 to Dow Ratio Overlaid with S&P 500 and 25-Week Correlation (Weekly)

Source: TradingView, John Kicklighter

It is hard to miss the disparity in performance between the two indices when we look at the historical chart of their ratio. The rise of AI – so well incapsulated by the more than 210 percent, peak-to-trough surge of NVDA through the year – can add another to factor to the relative shift of capital to this corner of the market. However, the transformative appeal of that segment may already be pushing its limits.

While a regulatory change that supercharges artificial intelligence in the US could prove an outlier amplifier, sentiment is more likely to take one of two paths. One scenario is risk either levels out or persists, whereby capital will more likely be diversified looking for ‘value’. Alternatively, a collapse in sentiment would likely render the concentration a distinct liability – as was the case in 2022.

 

Chart of the Nasdaq 100 to Dow Jones Industrial Average Ratio with VIX Volatility Index and 6-Month Correlation (Monthly)

Source: TradingView, John Kicklighter

In projecting how quickly and intensively the market is likely to rebalance across the risk spectrum, the catalyst and market backdrop play key factors. There was a bout of high volatility through August this last year, which was very acute but short-lived. Setting aside that brief period, the general volatility environment has been more akin to the period through 2017. Should activity conditions normalize under emerging fundamental issues, a correction like that seen this past August could turn into something more significant like what was experienced through 2022. Should the Nasdaq-Dow ratio drop beneath 0.35, something more systemic is likely to be afoot with sentiment undergoing a genuine sea change.

 

-- Written by John Kicklighter, Global Head of Content

This report is intended for general circulation only. It should not be construed as a recommendation, or an offer (or solicitation of an offer) to buy or sell any financial products. The information provided does not take into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. Before you act on any recommendation that may be contained in this report, independent advice ought to be sought from a financial adviser regarding the suitability of the investment product, taking into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs.

StoneX Financial Pte. Ltd., may distribute reports produced by its respective foreign entities or affiliates within the StoneX group of companies or third parties pursuant to an arrangement under Regulation 32C of the Financial Advisers Regulations. Where the report is distributed to a person in Singapore who is not an accredited investor, expert investor or an institutional investor (as defined in the Securities Futures Act), StoneX Financial Pte. Ltd. accepts legal responsibility to such persons for the contents of the report only to the extent required by law. Singapore recipients should contact StoneX Financial Pte. Ltd. at 6826 9988 for matters arising from, or in connection with the report.

In the case of all other recipients of this report, to the extent permitted by applicable laws and regulations neither StoneX Financial Pte. Ltd. nor its associated companies will be responsible or liable for any loss or damage incurred arising out of, or in connection with, any use of the information contained in this report and all such liability is hereby expressly disclaimed. No representation or warranty is made, express or implied, that the content of this report is complete or accurate.

StoneX Financial Pte. Ltd. is not under any obligation to update this report.

Trading CFDs and FX on margin carries a high level of risk that may not be suitable for some investors. Consider your investment objectives, level of experience, financial resources, risk appetite and other relevant circumstances carefully. The possibility exists that you could lose some or all of your investments, including your initial deposits. If in doubt, please seek independent expert advice. Visit www.cityindex.com/en-sg/terms-and-policies for the complete Risk Disclosure Statement.

ALL TRADING INVOLVES RISKS. LOSSES CAN EXCEED DEPOSITS.

City Index is a trading name of StoneX Financial Pte. Ltd. (“SFP”) for the offering of dealing services in Contracts for Differences (“CFD”). SFP holds a Capital Markets Services Licence issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore for Dealing in Exchange-Traded Derivatives Contracts, Over-the-Counter Derivatives Contracts, and Spot Foreign Exchange Contracts for the Purposes of Leveraged Foreign Exchange Trading. SFP is also both Derivatives Trading and Clearing member of the Singapore Exchange (“SGX”). SFP is a wholly-owned subsidiary of StoneX Group Inc.

The information provided herein is intended for general circulation. It does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person. You should take into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs before making a commitment to invest, including seeking advice from an independent financial adviser regarding the suitability of the investment, under a separate engagement, as you deem fit. No representation or warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Consequently, any person acting on it does so entirely at their own risk.

The information does not represent an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any investment product. Any views and opinions expressed may be changed without an update. To understand the risks and costs involved, please visit the section captioned “Important Information” and the “Risk Disclosure Statement”.

The information herein is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation.

StoneX Financial Pte. Ltd. 1 Raffles Place, #18-61, One Raffles Place Tower 2, Singapore 048616. Tel: 6309 1000. Co. Reg. No.: 201130598R.

This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.

© City Index 2025